• Post published:

Strength to Strength welcomed Philip Hess to critique the reformer’s views of soteriology.

Did the Protestant Reformers restore the true Apostolic doctrine to the church? Or did they fall short of this goal? Join us as we talk about how the Reformation teaching of “faith alone” did not represent the New Testament’s picture of faith. To support “faith alone”, the Reformers had to promote forensic justification and monergism. Their alliance with the state church kept them from understanding the New Testament vision for the church as a body of the faithful, and led them to make all kinds of compromises with the teachings of Jesus. In this talk, we will discuss “How the Reformers slipped in Soteriology”.

An interactive question-and-answer period follows.

philip and betsy hess family profile pic

Philip Hess lives in State College, Pennsylvania, with his wife Betsy and their seven children. When he is not reading or writing on a topic that interests him, he works in construction and keeps busy with church and family activities.

In the field of soteriology, he’s recently written a publication called Penal Substitution on Trial.

The Strength to Strength podcast is available through many outlets. Listen online, download episodes, or subscribe through your preferred provider.

Use our Dial-A-Message service to listen by phone, code 9256#. Click here for more information.

This presentation is part of a series called “Sacred Roots: Rediscovering the Ancient Faith.” Be sure to follow the entire series:

Strength to Strength Sacred Roots banner

AD 0–100 (Apostolic era):

AD 100–300 (Ante-Nicene era):

300–800 (early Medieval era)

800-1400 (late Medieval era)

1400–1600 (Reformation era)